• → European Space Agency

    • About Science & Technology

    • For Public

    • For Educators

    • ESA

    • Science & Technology

    • Rosetta

    • Missions
    • Show All Missions
    • Mission Home
    • Summary
    • Fact Sheet
    • Mission Team
    • Orbit View
    • Background Science
    • 67P/C-G
    • (2867) Steins
    • (21) Lutetia
    • Asteroids
    • Map of Lutetia
    • Orbiter
    • 3D Model
    • Instruments
    • Engineering
    • Lander
    • Instruments
    • Mission Operations
    • Mission Operations
    • Launch Vehicle
    • 2nd Rosetta Launch Campaign
    • Launch Information
    • ESOC Info
    • Science Operations
    • RSOC
    • Data Archive
    • Resources
    • News Archive
    • Multimedia Gallery
    • Publication Archive
    • Calendar of Events
    • Status Report Archive
    • Services
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Bookmark and Share

    Energy balance and the gas flux from the surface of comet 46P/Wirtanen

    Publication date: 22 Nov 1998

    Authors: Benkhoff, J.

    Journal: Planetary and Space Sciences
    Volume: 47
    Issue: 6-7
    Page: pp.735-744
    Year: 1998

    Copyright: Elsevier Science

    Understanding the power balance at the surface of the nucleus is essential to study the chemical and physical evolution of a comet. Therefore, we present a detailed energy budget analysis for the surface of a model comet in the orbit of 46P/Wirtanen, target comet of the European space craft mission Rosetta, for a variety of parameters and assumptions. We will show that for a fast spinning Jupiter-family comet such as 46P/Wirtanen with a rotation period of about 6 h, a fast rotator approximation underestimates the effective energy input. This yields lower gas fluxes from the surface. For an 100% active, non-dust covered surface we obtain a water gas flux on the order of about 1.5×1028 molecules s-1 at perihelion, assuming a radius of 600 m. The calculated gas flux of water is within the order of measured values for comet 46P/Wirtanen. But our calculated values are maximum gas fluxes at noon—not averaged over one cometary day or taking the lesser insolation at the polar areas into account. Therefore, we conclude that either the radius of comet 46P/Wirtanen may be much larger than the accepted value of 600 m. A radius in the order of 2 km seems more likely to explain the measurements. Or, an other possibility could be that water-ice particles are blown off from the surface like dust particles. This may also increase the effective surface area of sublimation.

    Link to Publication

    Last Update: 11 Aug 2003

    • Shortcut URL
    • http://sci.esa.int/jump.cfm?oid=25170

    Connect with us

    • RSS
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Flickr
    • Google Buzz
    • Livestream
    • Subscribe
    • App Store
    • ESA Science Twitter

    Follow ESA science

    • Copyright 2000 - 2013 © European Space Agency. All rights reserved.

    • Terms and Conditions